Control the source
Test, verify and constrain harmful, false or biased outputs.
Learn · Map · Trace · Act
Learn responsible AI, map your project, trace foreseeable consequences and receive practical actions you can use.
A false water-safety warning changes which source a community uses.
Move from input and processing to action and consequence.
Understand how source, pathway and receptor interact to form risk.
Combine pillar, affected level and severity.
Lesson 1 · Output to outcome
Foreseeable consequences need attention before, during and after AI use. A technically small output may become important when people trust it and act on it.
No AI output is inherently consequential or inconsequential. Its significance depends on context, audience, reliance and the action that follows.
Lesson 2 · Risk decoder
The environmental Source–Pathway–Receptor model provides a practical way to examine AI risk. Adjust each component to see why no single feature determines the consequence.
Thinking score
Risk becomes stronger where source potency, pathway transmissibility and receptor susceptibility overlap.
Test, verify and constrain harmful, false or biased outputs.
Reduce blind reliance, uncontrolled sharing and excessive automation.
Build capability, routes for challenge and safeguards for vulnerable users.
Lesson 3 · Three-dimensional consequence matrix
The pillars are causal routes to consequences. They matter because of what can happen next.
Selected consequence cell
Worked example · Water-safety prediction
An AI map labels a contaminated source as safe. A local officer trusts the output, the community continues using the source, and exposure leads to illness.
Apply it to your project
Describe the role of AI and assess eight safeguards. The tool identifies where further evidence, design or governance is needed.
Answer all 8 questions. 0 answered.
About this framework
This educational tool combines a lifecycle consequence pathway, an adapted Source–Pathway–Receptor risk model and a three-dimensional consequence matrix. It supports reflection and discussion. It does not replace legal, regulatory, ethical or domain-specific assessment.